From: Lucas Albers (admin_at_cs.montana.edu)
Date: Tue 03 Aug 2004 - 20:32:13 BST
Alberto Cammozzo said:
> I see a much more interesting solution with the two host servers
> sharing vservers between them: each one taking the vservers hosted
> by the other in case of its failure. This allows to use both host
> servers at time. I think this requires true (both read-write) shared
> storage, which I haven't at the moment.
> I described this in theory in . Sorry, in Italian. I'll translate
> if someone is interested. Perhaps you can look at the figures :)
Can't you get the same result by having multiple drbd mount mounts with
each drbd mount being active on 1 server and passive on the other?
-- Luke Computer Science System Administrator Security Administrator,College of Engineering Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana
_______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver