Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release

From: Sandino Araico Sánchez <sandino_at_sandino.net>
Date: Fri 29 Jul 2011 - 11:27:06 BST
Message-ID: <4E328AFA.8000208@sandino.net>

On 28/07/11 08:36, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> options IMHO are:
>
> - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term)
> - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet)
> - 3.0.x (immature, but the future)
>
> note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization
> will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to
> port such a kernel to the other branch (without need
> to redo all the testing and review)
>
> please share your thoughts and preferences in this
> thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to
>
> thanks in advance,
> Herbert
>

I have sent my donation.

My vote is for stabilizing 2.6.32 because that's what I use in most of
my production servers.
I will also try to contribute with the grsec-vserver patch if my time
availability permits it.

-- 
Sandino Araico Sánchez
http://sandino.net
Received on Fri Jul 29 11:27:29 2011
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Fri 29 Jul 2011 - 11:27:30 BST by hypermail 2.1.8