-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am a big fan of Debian, however I always use vanilla kernel + vserver experimental patches and compile the
util-vserver tools from source. Not the debian way, but good enough for a standalone box under my full control.
Cheers,
- -Nik
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:46:18PM +0200, Meik Sievertsen (new-data-services GmbH) wrote:
>> Timothee Besset wrote:
>>> Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:01:39AM +0100, ben@bristolwireless.net wrote:
>
>>>>> Personally I was really hoping to see a better quality Linux-Vserver
>>>>> support in Debian this time, so sad news.
>
>>>> Me, too.
>
>>>>> Anyone else any feelings about this? Any chance of a rescue attempt?
>
>>>> I think that sucks big time. I'm willing to help with testing, if
>>>> that's of any help.
>
>>> Same, we use vserver exclusively on Debian.
>
>> For us as well - we only use Debian and if there will be no longer
>> linux-vserver support we will simply use a different product.
>
> well, it's sad to see what power a distributor holds
> despite the fact that the debian Linux-VServer kernels
> have gotten really bad over time, religious debian users
> (like yourself?) cling to those broken kernels without
> ever considering an alternative ...
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
>> Regards,
>> Meik.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKwzn5AAoJEDFLYVOGGjgX3/YH+wThoC+jilTu0Ut5fTFpOhRd
sFdcZN0SJPFA9ZsPxlC3xHxUfdl9BEdPaFpUchEaUXJN/mEXMhPBGWpl+WfIQFr4
1JJSwffbju+/r20mzshr9LmiVnZqynrugd0BQa+TN0/TTXRyzeUZVhO/9erA9dkQ
YDbz3KNSTA544RjSzOzFIc9MKUfm2NDnxqBlZnXrTMqybTuI7Mi2buoLjkQeie+M
0ZCGfTvPc9wjoHJWpmD9223TfLWt96uhZ6DBptUrqxKT7ezGYhojegPX4yINshDB
274fbNm7aVsw/XONuMkDAYdPIXV4XorhUyECZn3BV/wTXeY/JtzPVKFcDeFQWGg=
=iPdW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wed Sep 30 11:59:32 2009