Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release

From: Roman Vesely <roman_at_liten.cz>
Date: Thu 28 Jul 2011 - 16:03:24 BST
Message-ID: <20110728170324.14e2e502@lenik>

V Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:49:41 +0200
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> napsáno:

> >> note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization
> >> will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to
> >> port such a kernel to the other branch (without need
> >> to redo all the testing and review)
>
> >> please share your thoughts and preferences in this
> >> thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to
>
> > Ok, I paid $ 500 (two working nights ;-)
> very appreciated!
> I added an entry on the Wiki.
>
> > I prefer stable and supported system.
> > (Debian stable, LTS kernel from kernel.org and LTS
> > vserver patch, like 2.2.0.x branch or openvz style support)
>
> I don't see OpenVZ support anything but RHEL ...
> I also take this as vote for 2.6.32.x, please clarify
> if I'm mistaken ...

Yes, I thought 2.6.32.x
2.6.32 is best choice for sysadmin's (used by all major distributions)

I think 2.6.32.x is a good choice for vserver team - less work and time than 3.x kernel.

Roman
Received on Thu Jul 28 16:03:37 2011

[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Thu 28 Jul 2011 - 16:03:37 BST by hypermail 2.1.8