Re: [vserver] Possible Hashify Corruption

From: Gordan Bobic <gordan_at_bobich.net>
Date: Sun 17 Oct 2010 - 14:17:58 BST
Message-ID: <4CBAF786.3090705@bobich.net>

On 17/10/2010 13:47, Adrian Reyer wrote:
> Hi Gordan,
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:29:07PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> RHEL6 as the host/guest). If one set was 32-bit and the other
>> 64-bit, the sizes would be different.
>
> I take it, checksums are the same as well?

No - the checksums are different!
It really does look like genuine corruption.

> What about a broken linker? Can you exec /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
> (Debian filename, might be named slightly different at your place)?
> That had been the issue with a similar effect without unification on a
> 32bit system I ran 2 years back. Nothing seemed to be exectutable
> anymore as a result.

I don't think this is an issue of bitness. And even if it was, file
command should have identified the files as binary
executables/libraries, rather than just plain "data".

Gordan
Received on Sun Oct 17 14:18:07 2010

[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Sun 17 Oct 2010 - 14:18:08 BST by hypermail 2.1.8