On 17/10/2010 13:47, Adrian Reyer wrote:
> Hi Gordan,
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:29:07PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> RHEL6 as the host/guest). If one set was 32-bit and the other
>> 64-bit, the sizes would be different.
> I take it, checksums are the same as well?
No - the checksums are different!
It really does look like genuine corruption.
> What about a broken linker? Can you exec /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
> (Debian filename, might be named slightly different at your place)?
> That had been the issue with a similar effect without unification on a
> 32bit system I ran 2 years back. Nothing seemed to be exectutable
> anymore as a result.
I don't think this is an issue of bitness. And even if it was, file
command should have identified the files as binary
executables/libraries, rather than just plain "data".
Received on Sun Oct 17 14:18:07 2010