On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 01:46:45PM +0200, Andre Timmermann wrote:
> Hello Herbert,
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
> > > Our new system has got 18.104.22.168 grsec2.1.13 vs22.214.171.124.7
> > > The SNMP-Server on the host is up and running (only bound to one IP)
> > I'd suggest using 2.6.27.x or going for a more recent
> > 2.6.31.x and be careful with grsec, it might cause
> > some unwanted effects and stability issues ...
> Hmm, http://linux-vserver.org/Welcome_to_Linux-VServer.org shows last
> *stable* version with grsec 126.96.36.199
> 188.8.131.52 with grsec is in experimental and 184.108.40.206 has no grsec-patch
> at all.
> This raises the question if grsec has benefits on a vserver host at
> I will compile a 220.127.116.11 without grsec for testing. I don't feel very
> well using an experimental kernel in an productive environment.
that's why we started a stabilization phase on our
way to the next devel, and ultimately stable release
feel free to speed up the process by donating, helping
out or getting a service contract with me ...
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen
> Andre Timmermann
> Nine Internet Solutions AG, Albisriederstr. 243c, CH-8047 Zuerich
Received on Fri Oct 2 22:24:58 2009