Re: [vserver] Up-to-date stable version?

From: John A. Sullivan III <>
Date: Mon 10 Aug 2009 - 22:02:13 BST
Message-Id: <>

On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 22:50 +0200, Claus Herwig wrote:
> Hello,
> as I've to compile a new kernel for one of my vserver boxes, it's time
> to come back to this much loved question:
> Which (vanilla) kernel and which vserver patch version should I use for
> a production system?
> I know this question isn't entirely new, but even after scanning through
> the last months of mailing list posts I'm missing a simple answer ;-)
> The website states + vs2.2.0.7, which is, well, ancient (1.5
> years old i.E.)
> A second look at the website says + vs2., which is
> experimental, what (at least for me) means that I shouldn't use it on a
> production system.
> Then I read in some other post, that it is of course useable in
> production - which just leads to another question: Why is it called
> experimental?
Funny, I was looking at this today as I need to rebuild one of our
vserver hosts. We've been using kernel 2.6.28 and 29. We've had a few
issues - a nasty kernel bug in both that occasionally requires a cold
boot (!) and constant segfaults in OSSEC. We've needed to be on those
kernels because of even worse problems with iSCSI in older kernels and
we've learned to avoid the hang problem. It still scares the living
daylights out of me and we are eagerly awaiting 2.6.30 which apparently
fixes this bug. However, when I mouse over the link to +
vs2., it still says pre3 so I am assuming it is not yet ready
for even daring production. Is that true? Thanks - John

John A. Sullivan III
Open Source Development Corporation
+1 207-985-7880
Making Christianity intelligible to secular society
Received on Mon Aug 10 22:01:52 2009
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Mon 10 Aug 2009 - 22:01:58 BST by hypermail 2.1.8