Re: [Vserver] please avoid vs2.1.0.5-vs2.1.0.7 ...

From: Martin Koniczek <>
Date: Sun 29 Jan 2006 - 08:37:14 GMT
Message-ID: <>

Mike O'Connor wrote:
> So which patch is safe for a 2.6.15 kernel and to the best of knowledge
> works correctly ?

For this cases, Herbert provided a special Patch Version for
(just a minor cleanup and the bug mentioned in this thread fixed)

(the front page got updated accordingly)

It works nice for my test scenarios at least, but it is of course still
a patch of the "experimental" tree, and becomes outdated quickly.

> I ask this because 2.6.15 is the only stable kernel which as support for
> ATA path thought for SATA, which is important for server reliability.
> I suppose the best thing would be someone with more skill then me to
> take a stable vs2.0 patch and get it working with the current stable
is the latest patch of the stable version and is reported to work?


Vserver mailing list
Received on Sun Jan 29 08:37:44 2006

[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Sun 29 Jan 2006 - 08:37:50 GMT by hypermail 2.1.8