Mike O'Connor wrote:
> So which patch is safe for a 2.6.15 kernel and to the best of knowledge
> works correctly ?
For this cases, Herbert provided a special Patch Version for 2.1.0.5
(just a minor cleanup and the bug mentioned in this thread fixed)
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.15-vs2.1.0.5.1.diff
(the front page http://linux-vserver.org/ got updated accordingly)
It works nice for my test scenarios at least, but it is of course still
a patch of the "experimental" tree, and becomes outdated quickly.
> I ask this because 2.6.15 is the only stable kernel which as support for
> ATA path thought for SATA, which is important for server reliability.
>
> I suppose the best thing would be someone with more skill then me to
> take a stable vs2.0 patch and get it working with the current stable
kernel.
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.15-vs2.0.1.2.diff
is the latest patch of the stable version and is reported to work?
cu,
cohan
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Sun Jan 29 08:37:44 2006