Re: [Vserver] please avoid vs2.1.0.5-vs2.1.0.7 ...

From: Mike O'Connor <vserver_at_pineview.net>
Date: Sun 29 Jan 2006 - 05:51:58 GMT
Message-ID: <43DC57FE.1060907@pineview.net>

Hi Herbert, All

So which patch is safe for a 2.6.15 kernel and to the best of knowledge
works correctly ?

I ask this because 2.6.15 is the only stable kernel which as support for
ATA path thought for SATA, which is important for server reliability.

I suppose the best thing would be someone with more skill then me to
take a stable vs2.0 patch and get it working with the current stable kernel.

Anyhow any ideas and help would be great.

Thanks
Mike

Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> ... experimental releases as a nasty bug
> leads to 'strange' behaviour when uts information
> is accidentially overwritten ... see
>
> http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/BUGHUNT/cohan-0001/
>
> for details ...
>
> vs2.1.0.8 is out, which fixes this issue ...
>
> thanks,
> Herbert
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Sun Jan 29 05:52:37 2006

[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Sun 29 Jan 2006 - 05:52:45 GMT by hypermail 2.1.8