From: Christian Mayrhuber (christian.mayrhuber_at_gmx.net)
Date: Thu 09 Sep 2004 - 11:28:57 BST
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 23:04, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote:
> > - classification (when is a patch stable) really depends
> > on the feedback from the community, no feedback might
> > be mistaken as good stability ...
> > - stable branch and release candidates will only get bugfixes,
> > no feature additions (feature freeze)
> ... and btw, the rc2 for 2.4.27: Has there been any reports on this
> one yet, except from those on the list?
> It has been a rc for a long time now, maybe it is time to "rebrand"
> it as the newest stable release for the 2.4 kernel?
> Best regards
> Tor Rune Skoglund
My low loaded machine is now up for:
12:21:34 up 28 days, 1:29, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.08
Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 (root_at_build) (gcc version 3.3.4
(Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004
vservers are on lv's with reiserfs + chris masons data logging patches + daily
snapshots for backups. No single problem during service.
jgalvez_at_webpipe.net wrote that he'd try it on some heavy loaded machines,
but I have not heard anything about it since then.
-- lg, Chris _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver