From: Christian Mayrhuber (christian.mayrhuber_at_gmx.net)
Date: Thu 30 Oct 2003 - 13:23:59 GMT

• Previous message: Alexander Goeres: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"
• In reply to: Herbert Poetzl: "[Vserver] any last comments?"
• Next in thread: Enrico Scholz: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"
• Reply: Enrico Scholz: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"

Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> If you would like to comment on c17f, which
> is going to be released as vserver-1.0, please
> do it now ...
Found no stability problems with it on an Athlon testing machine
together with util-vserver 0.23.92.
BUT: util-vserver does not comply with debian policy.
   It does not honor the VSERVERS_ROOT variable in /etc/vservers.conf.
   The /vservers/ path is hardcoded in several source files, but debian
   wants to have the root dir of the vservers in /var/lib/vservers.

IMHO: There should be a big note not to compile the kernel with IPV6
support in the vserver-1.0 release, otherwise lots of people will end up
with an insecure system.

Will the development of vserver switch to kernel 2.6? Forward port of c17f?

-- 
lg, Chris
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

• Previous message: Alexander Goeres: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"
• In reply to: Herbert Poetzl: "[Vserver] any last comments?"
• Next in thread: Enrico Scholz: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"
• Reply: Enrico Scholz: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"