On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:12:22AM +0100, Ben Green wrote:
> It would be really good to have a working patch with IPv6.
> Herbert Poetzl will you consider patching for us?
I've uploaded a patch for 4.1.42 with hopefully the
right changes to the ipv6 code to make it work in
the same way as it did before (needs testing).
I will soon update the older long term kernel patches
and then start working on the stable mainline branches,
so any help there is welcome :)
All the best,
Herbert
> The other possible "revert the conflicting upstream commit before
> applying the linux-vserver patch" we could also consider. I have
> absolutely no idea what that would do in terms of IPv6, though it
> would seem that we've all been running without it for years, and that
> it adds a feature for corner case of specific IPv4 mapping that we
> could live without.
> What do people think?
> Cheers,
> Ben
> Quoting Corey Wright <undefined@pobox.com>:
>> you can either:
>> * revert the conflicting upstream commit before applying the
>> linux-vserver patch.
>> * apply my patch which *ignorantly* merges the two (giving preference to
>> the linux-vserver code as i don't use ipv6).
>> * ask somebody (herbert?) to *intelligently* fix-up the vserver patch.
Received on Tue Jul 18 18:02:55 2017