Re: [vserver] linux 3.10.4[789] and patch-3.10.43-vs2.3.6.8.diff

From: Corey Wright <undefined_at_pobox.com>
Date: Fri 18 Jul 2014 - 06:02:24 BST
Message-Id: <20140718000224.b3c57e2dee9a94efc4e1e2e4@pobox.com>

On Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:43:24 -0500
Corey Wright <undefined@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:09:21 -0500
> Corey Wright <undefined@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > applying patch-3.10.43-vs2.3.6.8.diff to linux 3.10.47 fails.
>
> and with linux 3.10.48.

and with linux 3.10.49

> > the upstream change of calling syscall_tracepoint_update() within copy_process
> > () [1] invalidates the patch context and causes the patch hunk to fail:
> >
> > patching file kernel/fork.c
> > Hunk #9 FAILED at 1495.
> > 1 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/fork.c.rej
> >
> > [1]
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/kernel/fork.c?h=linux-3.10.y&id=e6bc60b8fb412b38db86bc1351f2ce40ad31d0e0
> >
> > the attached patch adjusts the patch context and fixes Makefile's
> > EXTRAVERSION, too.
>
> the previously attached patch adjusts the patch context but does not fix the
> Makefile's EXTRAVERSION for 3.10.48.
>
> > from my novice kernel analysis it doesn't appear to
> > matter which comes first, the call to syscall_tracepoint_update() or the
> > failed hunk (assuming CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS & CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> > are defined, otherwise it for sure doesn't matter as syscall_tracepoint_update
> > () is an empty function and should get optimized out; see
> > include/trace/syscall.h), but verification would be appreciated (and i placed
> > syscall_tracepoint_update() before the failed hunk).
>
> verification still appreciated (though i've been running 3.10.47 with the
> previously attached patch in production for 12 hours now).

i've appreciated confirmation from Florian and Guy-.

> > instructions:
> > 1. acquire linux-3.10.47
> > 2. apply patch-3.10.43-vs2.3.6.8.diff
> > 3. apply the attached patch-3.10.43-47-vs2.3.6.8.diff
>
> 1. acquire linux-3.10.48
> 2. apply patch-3.10.43-vs2.3.6.8.diff
> 3. apply the attached patch-3.10.43-47-vs2.3.6.8.diff
> 4. manually fix the Makefile reject (EXTRAVERSION)

1. acquire linux-3.10.49
2. apply patch-3.10.43-vs2.3.6.8.diff
3. apply the attached patch-3.10.43-47-vs2.3.6.8.diff
4. manually fix the Makefile reject (EXTRAVERSION)

> > i've successfully built the resulting kernel and tested it in virtualbox
> > against testme.sh and testfs.sh and started a vserver.
>
> same for linux 3.10.48-vs2.3.6.8 (with delta-proc-feat01.diff).

same for linux 3.10.49-vs2.3.6.8 (with delta-proc-feat01.diff).

corey

--
undefined@pobox.com
> > corey
> > --
> > undefined@pobox.com
Received on Fri Jul 18 06:00:28 2014
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Fri 18 Jul 2014 - 06:00:28 BST by hypermail 2.1.8