Hi Daniel -
How are you? Was wondering if you had a sense of "interest" at this
point? I've seen some traffic around half a dozen or so people being
interested, but wasn't sure if there was more interest or whether this
is too small a number....do you have a sense at this point? Thanks - Ted
On 11/14/13 05:59, Ghislain wrote:
> Le 13/11/2013 19:59, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson a écrit :
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> Ted Barnes wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel:
>>>
>>> How are you? Are you thinking of taking a swing at this? Ted
>> Yeah, if there is enough interest for it compared to how much effort it
>> might be, I'd gladly do it.
>>
>> Best,
>> Daniel
>>
>
>
> I am insterested in that because hypervisor type thing could make a
> lot easier the management.
>
> Right now we use the util vservers tools with a bunch of puppet and
> home made script. I think basicaly everyone is using his home made
> tools to make them work. With libvirt capability to manage the guest
> we can use tools that have been developed and tied to greater parts
> like openstack and such big thingy without loosing the most important
> part of the virtualisation tech we love:
>
> - KISS principle
> - Efficiency
> - tech guy based solution that focus on the core thing
>
>
> that way all the fancy work is done by hypervisor management tool and
> we can plug our vserver in those systems while vserver manage the
> internals for our guests.
>
> Perhaps the libvirt for LXC could be a good fondation for the part
> they have in common with vserver (all the cgroup management part),
> don't know if this is better to start from scratch or to build on top
> of it. the real thing is that i really do not know how much work this
> can be. I heard from previous discution that the network part was the
> issue that came up the most has vserver isolate where all other
> virtualize this part.
>
>
> regards,
> Ghislain.
Received on Tue Nov 19 16:53:17 2013