On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:52:07 +1000
Fog_Watch <db5@exemail.com.au> wrote:
> What changes are needed to prevent a high guest CPU load, when
> combined with an IFB ingress interface, from dropping packets?
Since the last post I've successfully used cpuset to distribute my cores
so that, I think, my host has one entirely to itself:
cset:
Name CPUs-X MEMs-X Tasks Subs Path
------------ ---------- - ------- - ----- ---- ----------
root 0-7 y 0 y 175 4 /
as 1-4 n 0 n 61 0 /as
kdc 7 n 0 n 2 0 /kdc
voip 5 n 0 n 70 0 /voip
hf 6 n 0 n 32 0 /hf
The problem remains.
When ingress traverses an IFB, with a high host CPU load, packets are
not dropped, but when a guest CPU load is high packets are dropped. How
do I prevent my guest-related packet drops?
Regards
Fog_Watch
-- "A. Because it breaks the logical order of conversation. Q. Why is top posting bad?"Received on Wed Aug 14 06:32:27 2013