On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:17:56PM +0100, Phil Daws wrote:
> So far so good in our lab running 3.2.15-vs2.3.2.8 :) Six guests running while Bonnie++ is hammering the SAN interfaces on the root system. Will leave another 24 hours and then look to upgrade one of the Production servers.
Thanks for the confirmation. I'll try upgrading all my production
machines to it this weekend.
> --
> Thanks, Phil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:51:31PM +0100, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Phil Daws <uxbod@splatnix.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > we are about to build a new production server and unsure which
> > > > kernel and
> > > > vserver release to use. There were recent discussions about a
> > > > stable V3
> > > > release though I cannot recall seeing anything since. Any
> > > > thoughts which we
> > > > should go for ? Obviously stability is paramount to us; like you
> > > > all as-well
> > >
> > > i can speak only for myself, but all my severs are solid stable
> > > with
> > >
> > > 3.0.24-vs2.3.2.3-beng
> >
> > I've had crash issues with 3.0 (see list archives) but they seem to
> > be gone with 3.2.15-vs2.3.2.8-beng (caveat, this is only a single
> > guest running Tor at about 20% load so doesn't mean much).
> >
-- Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BEReceived on Tue May 15 14:49:14 2012