Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:19:44PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > options IMHO are:
>
> > - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term)
> > - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet)
> > - 3.0.x (immature, but the future)
>
> here the status so far:
> all the money so far is on 2.6.32.x while the majority
> votes for 3.0.x ...

As far as I see I'm the only one who pledges for ::1 isolation,
am I correct?
 
> 2.6.32.x 2.6.38.x 3.0.x Other $$$
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Tor Rune Skoglund - - X -
> Gordan Bobic - X X -
> John A. Sullivan III - - X -
> Roman Vesely X - - - 500 USD
> Nikolay Kichukov X - - -
> Michael Auckland - - X -
> Mr Jarry - - - X
> Corey Wright X - - -
> Sandino Araico Sánchez X - - - 200 USD
> Romain Riviere - X X -
>
> please correct me if I did misinterpret any response ...
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
> > note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization
> > will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to
> > port such a kernel to the other branch (without need
> > to redo all the testing and review)
>
> > please share your thoughts and preferences in this
> > thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to
>
> > thanks in advance,
> > Herbert

-- 
Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE