----- Forwarded message from Andrew Ruthven <email@example.com> -----
From: Andrew Ruthven <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:16:55 +1200
Subject: Re: [vserver] assigning less than /64 to individual guests
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:10 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Permitting autoconfig to work seems like a nice thing to retain.
But not really necessary. For my vservers I allocate a /112 to them, on
dummy0 and route a /64 from eth0 to dummy0.
On some other vserver hosts where I can't setup routing for a new
address block, I allocate /112s listening on eth0. I still do SNAT for
IPv4 on dummy0. Quite handy, it means the vservers don't use up IPv4
addresses from the LAN, I still get outbound IPv4 transit, but I can get
to the vserver via IPv6.
Not much management overhead, and autoconfig isn't required for IPv6 to
-- Andrew Ruthven Wellington, New Zealand At home: email@example.com | linux.conf.au 2012 | Come with us, Under the Stars | http://lcaunderthestars.org.au ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BEReceived on Tue May 17 20:20:19 2011