Re: [vserver] Re: [Freedombox-discuss] [vserver] Re: A software architecture for the FreedomBox

From: Roderick A. Anderson <raanders_at_cyber-office.net>
Date: Thu 14 Apr 2011 - 22:52:03 BST
Message-ID: <4DA76C83.5050008@cyber-office.net>

Ghislain wrote:
>> but that would still be relatively expensive - KSM iterates through
>> and dedupes all the madvise()-ed memory every few seconds. In
>> comparison, the vserver's hashify feature is free in terms of run-time
>> overheads.
>>
>> Gordan
>>
>
> this is why i love vserver they all ways seems to choose the simplest
> and most efficient way. They follow the KISS principle very well and
> really this is why this is such a great project.

+3

Though not familiar with all the nuts-and-bolts/bits-and bytes of the
kernel. Heck not even close I keep seeing the same thing. A simple and
clean implementation.

\\||/
Rod

-- 
Received on Thu Apr 14 22:52:16 2011
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Thu 14 Apr 2011 - 22:52:16 BST by hypermail 2.1.8