I'll see if I can build a test environment.
Debian's package includes the mainline patchsets up through 2.6.32.30.
According to the website vs2.3.0.36.29.6 (the one in squeeze) is the one for mainline 2.6.32.28.. is that correct?
Is the memory accounting support for cgroup still marked experimental or was that deemed stable in a later kernel release?
Joe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:herbert@13thfloor.at]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:28 AM
> To: Joe Gooch
> Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> Subject: Re: [vserver] Resource Limit issues
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:13:52PM +0000, Joe Gooch wrote:
> > I have several servers that have run Debian Lenny w/ kernel 2.6.22.19
> > for quite some time without any issues. I've been doing rolling
> > upgrades to Squeeze... and I've encountered some strange limiting
> > behavior.
>
> > Some of my vservers have limits on resource usage (i.e. rlimits/as,
> > rlimits/nproc, rlimits/rss), and have been experiencing out of memory
> > issues to the extent that I can't even vserver exec processes into
> the
> > namespace anymore.
>
> > Looking at all my /proc/virtual/xxx/limit I see the following:
> > VM: 73456 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 7264 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > *VM: -27253 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 6751 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 183464 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 1261030 0/ 2224643 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 41791 0/ 199142 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 191196 0/ 258038 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 199354 0/ 1603723 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 670480 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > -VM: 45315 0/ 1200000 1200000/ 1200000 0
> > VM: 31508 0/ 300000 300000/ 300000 0
> > *VM: -88860 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 431386 0/ 502421 -1/ -1 0
> > *VM: -14804 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
> > VM: 25737 0/ -1 -1/ -1 0
>
> > Notice have 3 vservers on different hosts that have negative
> "current"
> > values for virtual memory. (at the moment) The ones that have no
> > hard/soft limit are ok... but if I have a hard limit configured, I
> > can't spawn any more processes when this happens. I have a vserver
> > where this happens at least once a day. (the dashed one above)
>
> > I would assume that a negative current value is a bug...
>
> definitely a bug, you might check with the mainline 2.6.32.28
> kernel and appropriate patch, if you can recreate the issue
> there, let me know and we'll investigate ...
>
> > Is there a delta to fix this?
>
> no idea, the VM/RSS accounting and limits have been dropped
> in favor to the mainline cgroup accounting which is used in
> all newer kernels
>
> > Kernel is 2.6.32-5-vserver from squeeze. (mostly 686 kernels)...
> > In looking at their deb it looks like they're using vs2.3.0.36.29.6.
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
> > Thanks.
> > Joe
> >
Received on Thu Mar 10 15:33:30 2011