Re: [vserver] searching for vserver template

On Wednesday, September 29, 2010, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 29, 2010, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> >> Chuck wrote:
> >>> i have a need for a modern redhat/fedora or suse vserver template 64bit. must be
> > 64bit. i
> >>> am having trouble locating such an animal. i have to check with the software vendors
> > but
> >>> it may be possible it will also run under centos 64bit but i dont want to run the
> >>> troublesome 4.3 versions.. would need something newer.
> >>>
> >>> anyone know where i can get one?
> >> When you say template, do you mean the config file templates, or an
> >> actual tar ball of a minimum install? I've recently made one for RHEL6b,
> >> and that was pretty straight forward to derive from the config templates
> >> available. Usual things about upstart distros apply (set init style to
> >> "plain", and disable console output in the init configs).
> >>
> >> I found I also had to port the yum patches to the yum version included
> >> with RHEL6b. I posted that here the other day, you should be able to
> >> find it in the archives. For the rest I can send you a tar ball, if you
> >> are interested in the RHEL6b configs.
> >>
> >> You will, of course, have to roll your own kernel with vserver patches,
> >> but that's straightforward enough. I never bothered to rpm my kernel build.
> >>
> >
> > i use gentoo on the host and that is already set for vserver and is running several. i
> > just have a need for a recent redhat guest since an app we want to run requires redhat
and
> > wont run on anything else.
> >
> > my preference is to find a complete running vserver guest thatr i can just install and
run
> > and then add to as i need.
>
> So, you want a tar ball of /vserver/<guestname>, rather than the
> /etc/vservers/* configs? i.e. you don't want to do a vyum type install?
>
sorry for all the msgs... just a reminder it must be 64bit or the app wont run.

> I can certainly build you a basic tar ball of a RHEL6b system (don't
> have a CentOS 5 setup handy at the moment, and you probably shouldn't be
> putting a beta version into production). I think you'd have to
> internalize the package management if you don't have yum on the host,
> though. You'd also have to make sure that your kernel is of a suitable
> version. IIRC, RHEL/CentOS 5.x and derivatives have problems with
> kernels 2.6.28+.
>
> Gordan
>

-- 
Chuck