Hello,
Do virt_load and virt_mem work as expected in VServer 2.3.0.36 ? Or do I
misunderstand them ?
Kernel used (compiled by ben@bristolwireless.net) : 2.6.29.2-vs2.3.0.36.10-
beng (OK, if I have time, I will compile my own kernel ...)
1) virt_load : "monvs" and "nono" are two VServers with virt_load activated
# cat /etc/vservers/monvs/flags
virt_mem
virt_load
I run "burnMMX" inside both VServers : the load average is the same under the
VServers and the host, around 1.9, each burnMM process consuming aroud 50 % of
my CPU.
Same thing when I activate "sched_hard" : in this case, I would expect the
load average to stay at 1 inside the VServers, and each burnMMX appearing as
consuming 100% of the (allocated slice of the) CPU
2) virt_mem : with VServer version 2.0, the "swap" size displayed inside a
VServer used to be "AS.hard - RSS.hard".
Now, the memory is displayed virtualized (as expected equal to RSS.hard), but
the swap is always 0.
-- Xavier Montagutelli Tel : +33 (0)5 55 45 77 20 Service Commun Informatique Fax : +33 (0)5 55 45 75 95 Universite de Limoges 123, avenue Albert Thomas 87060 Limoges cedexReceived on Mon May 25 10:55:31 2009