Re: [vserver] CentOS 5.3 host update/upgrade

From: Roderick A. Anderson <raanders_at_cyber-office.net>
Date: Thu 16 Apr 2009 - 18:08:07 BST
Message-ID: <49E765F7.8000802@cyber-office.net>

John Alberts wrote:
> This was a yum update from CentOS 5.1. All was fine except the
> problems with yum. The problems with yum were fixed with the patched
> rpm.

WOW, great! I'm coming from 5.2. As I think on it, one of the systems
   was a 5.0 or 5.1 and somewhere along the line became a 5.2. Should
keep better records but everything works so well I almost never have to
go back and point fingers -- at myself. :-)

I have a _less_ used system I'll try first.

My thanks to you and John Sullivan for doing the bleeding!

\\||/
Rod

-- 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Roderick A. Anderson
> <raanders@cyber-office.net> wrote:
>> John Alberts wrote:
>>> I'm running CentOS 5.3 on the host and all guests now.  The patched
>>> yum is working fine and I haven't had any stability issues at all.
>> Thanks.  Was this done as a yum update or a fresh install?
>>
>>
>> \\||/
>> Rod
>> --
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:56 AM, John A. Sullivan III
>>> <jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 07:39 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>>>>> Anyone (John?) running CentOS 5 as the host distribution?
>>>>>
>>>>> If so have any of you updated to CentOS 5.3?
>>>>>
>>>>> And ... John have you finished your tests on the patched yum?  Results?
>>>>>  Good, bad or ugly?  :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> \\||/
>>>>> Rod
>>>> So far, it is working fine.  Guest installations of both CentOS 5.3 and
>>>> Ubuntu 8.0.4 all ran fine.  vyum from the host and yum from the guest
>>>> appear to be running fine.  Cloning is fine.  We are having a bit of an
>>>> issue with hashify but I do not believe this is at all related to yum.
>>>>
>>>> We did hit a problem with processes spinning out of control and not
>>>> being able to be killed without a hard boot of the host.  Apparently
>>>> this is not an issue with yum or CentOS but rather the 2.6.28 kernel we
>>>> are running and it is supposedly fixed in 2.6.29 so we are eagerly
>>>> awaiting the final patch from vserver.  There were compelling reasons
>>>> for us to use ext4 and we felt a little funny relying on the backport
>>>> into 2.6.18 which shipped with 5.3.  We normally don't play this close
>>>> to the cutting edge so it has been an adventure!  Thanks for all your
>>>> help - John
>>>> --
>>>> John A. Sullivan III
>>>> Open Source Development Corporation
>>>> +1 207-985-7880
>>>> jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.spiritualoutreach.com
>>>> Making Christianity intelligible to secular society
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thu Apr 16 18:08:29 2009
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Thu 16 Apr 2009 - 18:08:30 BST by hypermail 2.1.8