On Thu March 27 2008 08:12, Natanael Copa wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 08:05 -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > On Thu March 27 2008 04:28, Oliver Welter wrote:
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > are there any schedules for the release of "stable" 2.6.24 patches? I
> > > have to upgrade my kernels and if it is a matter of days, I will go
> > > directly go on 2.6.24...
> > >
> > > Are there any known issues with patch-2.6.24-rc6-vs2.2.0.5.0.3?
> > >
> >
> > I know it applies - 2 rejects, the Makefile (or course) and one for fs/proc/array.c
> > (If I recall the filename correctly) - which you can ignore - it is trying to comment
> > out code which has been removed.
> >
> > I do not make enough use of it to find problems - it boots and appears to work.
> >
> > The developers do not appear to be dead - somebody keeps posting patches for 2.6.22-xxx
> > but they are very silent on the subject of 2.6.24 (Alpine Linux has a vsgrsec patched
> > 2.6.23 - without any clues how they got it).
>
> No. Alpine Linux have 2 kernels. The 2.6.23 is without vserver patches.
> vserver kernel in alpine uses 2.6.22.
>
Guess I haven't booted both yet or I would have noticed that.
> I also wonders how to follow the 2.6.24 progress. Normally you can
> follow projects development from svn or git or similar and test the
> latest of the latest and submit patches.
>
> If anyone knows how to follow vserver for 2.6.24 development, please let
> us know.
>
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/
It sorts by age - always go to the bottom of the page and work up.
Mike
> -nc
>
> > Mike
> > >
> > > Oliver
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 28 20:17:48 2008