On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:02:59AM +0100, Gebhardt Thomas wrote:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 01:05, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > OpenVZ is not OOT?
> of course, you're right: OpenVZ is also out-of-tree (but they
> started to include patches into the -mm tree)
well, fortunately they started to include non OpenVZ
patches into the kernel :)
anyway, better let's drop this, before the OVZ folks
get annoyed and start with 'cease and desist' orders.
> Cheers, Thomas
Received on Thu Jan 10 17:02:48 2008