On Sat January 5 2008 18:36, Ed W wrote:
> > I do something very similar in my alpine linux distro. Instead of just
> > continuing in initramfs, the init script mounts a tmpfs, finds a base
> > installation (2-3MB) and "switch_root" to the tmpfs. From here it loads
> > a set of packages (from usb/cdrom/cf) and configuration (from
> > usb/floppy/cf).
> > >From this base installation it is possible to mount disks, raid, iscsi,
> > lvm and fire up vserver guests.
> Hi Natanael
> I have followed your posts in gentoo-embedded mailing list. I have only
> examined alpine-linux a little, but I'm not quite sure why you use the
> tmpfs rather than say keeping with the initramfs and perhaps using aufs
> to overwrite with additional packages, and perhaps even adding a
> writeable /etc directory? (Actually on the wrt linksys distros they
> often add a writable partition with symlinks into /etc, or vice-versa)
> Having only an initramfs seems like a very sensible solution for
> Michael? He could use a second partition for writable stuff and mount
> it rw - then simply symlink in anything required from the static
> partition to give a kind of updatable /etc/ (or whatever)
> I'm researching something similar myself, but in my case I want quite a
> lot of stuff in the base distro (30-60MB perhaps) and so your tmpfs
> approach seems like quite a waste when I only have 128 or 256MB or ram
> on the devices I want to use...?
The system I am targeting is unusual for an embedded system in the amount
of ram. Stock is 0.5Gb user expandable to 2.0Gb.
There is a lot of information on the web about people trying to trim down
a desktop or full-sized laptop distro for this machine.
I am trying the other approach - start with what I would use for an embedded
system - let natural growth and feature creep claim the additional resources.
I am including auFS in the build. auFS includes patches for L-Vs.
Also squashfs+lzma compression probably for /lib/modules/<version>/
maybe for other parts of the tree. Haven't checked that yet for L-Vs support.
The builds I am making are using initial ramFS (which is r/w) not initrd
(which is r/o) - so finding a place for writable areas is not a concern.
> Anyone else got any other thoughts on this?
> Ed W
Received on Sun Jan 6 13:48:49 2008