On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Oliver Paulus wrote:
> >@@ -797,7 +817,8 @@ out:
> > return error;
> >}
> Sorry. My previous post was not correct. The out part has no changes in this
> case - but why does I get a reject for this code change?
> > goto out;
> > locks_copy_lock(new_fl, request);
> > locks_insert_lock(&inode->i_flock, new_fl);
> >+ vx_locks_inc(new_fl);
> > new_fl = NULL;
> > error = 0;
>
> These lines had a failure in the previous post:
> >And this is the code part in the 2.6.22.9 "fs/locks.c" source:
> > goto out;
> > locks_copy_lock(new_fl, request);
> > locks_insert_lock(before, new_fl);
> > vx_locks_inc(new_fl);
> > new_fl = NULL;
> > error = 0;
> this is correct:
> goto out;
> locks_copy_lock(new_fl, request);
> locks_insert_lock(before, new_fl);
> new_fl = NULL;
> error = 0;
there is a 2.6.22.9-vs2.3.0.25 available now, and
a vs2.2.x version will be there soon ...
HTH,
Herbert
> --
> Oliver Paulus
>
> OpenPGP
> Key id: 28D9C44F
> Fingerprint: EADA 62FC 07DC 3361 A3D6 4174 2DE3 C027 28D9 C44F
> Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x28D9C44F
Received on Sun Sep 30 20:33:16 2007