[vserver] Re: VSERVER_SECURITY vs KEYS

From: Andreas Baetz <lac01_at_web.de>
Date: Tue 18 Sep 2007 - 13:47:37 BST
Message-Id: <200709181447.37997.lac01@web.de>

On Saturday 15 September 2007, Benedikt Boehm <hollow@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:50:51 +0200
> Andreas Baetz <lac01@web.de> wrote:
>
> > I tried to enable ecryptfs in 2.6.22.6 and found that
> > it is disabled in the config because "access key retention support"
> > is diabled because of patch-2.6.22.6-vs2.2.0.3.diff:
> >
> > config KEYS
> > bool "Enable access key retention support"
> > + depends on !VSERVER_SECURITY
> > help
> >
> > Can somebody explain ?
>
> <Hollow> Bertl_zZ, daniel_hozac: i just got a mail why CONFIG_KEYS
> can't be used together with VSERVER_SECURITY (needed for ecryptfs), but
> i have no idea :)
> <daniel_hozac> Hollow: it's not isolated.
> <daniel_hozac> Hollow: and you most definitely don't want different
> guests having access to the same keys...
>
> >
> > Also, what exactly does VSERVER_SECURITY mean and why is it not
> > possible to deselect it in the kernel config (make xconfig) - At
> > least I didn't find the option ?
> >

Is there a way to enable both vserver and ecryptfs ?

Andreas

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
**********************************************************************
Received on Tue Sep 18 13:48:30 2007

[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Tue 18 Sep 2007 - 13:48:35 BST by hypermail 2.1.8