First, thanks a lot Herbert for your hard work and support ! This new
stable version is a great news !
Like Chuck, I've ran in a lot of programs (especially in the VOIP
domain) that requires hack to work around with 127.0.0.1:
asterisk
freepbx
phpmyadmin (for some small features I don't recall)
flashoperator panel
bind (related to pam something)
sendmail (don't remember what options)
I don't remember anymore but I've had problems with another half dozen.
Imho, the "127.0.0.1" issue is by far the most painful for a newbie.
Sincerely,
Adrien
On 4/1/07, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:15:37PM -0400, Chuck wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 April 2007 12:33, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >
> >
> > dumb question..... i didnt see it in the changelog but then
> > again i may not know what i am looking at :)
> >
> > 1. will production vserver code soon have real 127.0.0.1
> > unique to each guest?
>
> probably, I guess 2.2.1 will have that ...
>
> > this is something that is sorely needed to prevent hours
> > of possibly insecure workarounds with some software.
>
> I am not aware of many software packages which
> would require any changes to work with the
> current implementation (in this regard)
>
> > 2. this looks like the production version of what we are
> > currently running...
>
> > util-vserver 0.30.212-r2
> > kernel 2.6.19-vs2.2.0-rc2
>
> > I suspect an upgrade to production would not hurt us considering our
> > kernel version.. i guess my question is would it be a seamless upgrade
> > for us to production?
>
> I hope so ...
>
> > i would probably bump the kernel to 2.6.20 at the same time.
>
> 2.6.19.7 and 2.6.20.4 should be both fine, but
> a lot of minor issues were ironed out between
> rc2 and final (rc21+ :) same goes for the tools
> btw, which are at 0.30.213-rc6
>
> HTC,
> Herbert
>
> > > Greetings Community!
> > >
> > > after a longer rc stage, to get rid of all the
> > > minor issues, we proudly present the first release
> > > of the new stable 2.2 branch, which includes all
> > > the 'considered stable' features of the previous
> > > devel branch (2.1.x) which has been superceded by
> > > the 2.3.x devel branch ...
> > >
> > > http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.2.0/
> > > (tools supposed to work fine on Mandriva 2007.x)
> > >
> > > thanks to all who helped in development and did
> > > test the release candidates ...
> > >
> > > enjoy,
> > > Herbert
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Vserver mailing list
> > > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > "...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger,
> > and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath
> > or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose
> > for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. "
> > The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Vserver mailing list
> > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
>
-- Adrien Laurent Chief Information Officer (514) 284-2020 x 202 adrien@modulis.ca www.modulis.ca Technical questions? support@modulis.ca _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserverReceived on Mon Apr 2 04:38:34 2007