On Monday 22 January 2007 22:39, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.01.22 22:01:59 +0100, Markus Schuster wrote:
> > Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > >> I had no problems patching older 2.6.16 kernels with XEN and
> > >> vserver, but with the more recent one, the latest available vserver
> > >> patch for 2.6.16 (patch-2.6.16.20-vs2.0.2-rc22.diff) does not apply
> > >> without dozens of rejects that I can't fix myself.
> > >
> > > I take it that you are actually volunteering to test
> > > such a kernel with and without Xen meshed in ...
> >
> > I think I can't follow your thoughts here :) Should I try to patch a
> > vanilla 2.6.16.37 with patch-2.6.16.20-vs2.0.2-rc22.diff or what do you
> > mean? I'm also ready to test a pre-made 2.6.16.37 with XEN and vserver
> > patches applyed as long as it won't eat up my server :)
>
> It basically means "I would create a patch for you, iff you promise to
> actually test it and give feedback etc.". There were quite a few feature
> requests in the past where those who "filed" them simply disappeared,
> thus Bertl tries to make sure that such a thing does not happen before
> he starts working on stuff that is not of interest for the majority of
> users.
Count me in if you need people to test a vserver 2.0.x patch for the vanilla
2.6.16.x kernel.
Best regards,
Bert.
> HTH
> Björn
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Tue Jan 23 12:17:56 2007