On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> Sheldon Knight wrote:
> >
> >
> >I have just built and successfully run a Redhat Linux 2.6.18.3 vserver
> >vs2.1.1.2 patched kernel and installed util-vserver-0.30.210 tools.
> > When I ran testme.sh I go the following output. What have I missed?
>
> More specifically, how on earth did you manage to get this? I.e. what
> commands did you use?
> Also, why did you go with an old version of the tools?
please try to get 0.30.211 or 0.30.212-rc*
> > Use dietlibc: no (you have been warned)
>
> You really should install dietlibc and use that.
indeed, most issues go away when compiled with dietlibc
> > Available APIs:
> >legacy,compat,v11,fscompat,v13obs,v13,net,oldproc,olduts
>
> How did you manage to build the legacy API? I haven't been able to build
> that for a while.
>
> > build/host:
> > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >...
> > syscall(2) invocation: traditional
> >
> > vserver(2) syscall#: 273/glibc
>
> Well, this is wrong. First of all, you probably should use the
> alternative or at least fast syscall invocation. Secondly, the syscall
> number is 236 on x86_64. How you got these values is beyond me, only
> thing I can think of is something like a mix of x86 and x86_64.
yep, it would be correct for 32bit tools (on x86 and x86_64)
but the arch/build/host shows a 64bit (x86_64) environment
best,
Herbert
> --
> Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
> GPG id: 06723412
> GPG fingerprint: A455 4DF3 990A 431F FECA 7947 6136 DDA2 0672 3412
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Wed Dec 6 23:10:12 2006