Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> I think so, who is going to maintain it?
if you give me the diffs between rc's, i'll keep them up to date for
2.6.16 (as i'm not that fond of 2.6.17 kernel just yet... i'll wait for
a 22.214.171.124 or so, before i consider that one "stable")
as for grsec + vserver patches, i'm afraid i'll have to go to 2.6.17
rather fast, since spender doesn't support 2.6.16 kernels anymore...
when vs2.0.2 comes out, and grsec 2.1.9, i'll try to fix a general patch
for 2.6.16 aswell as 2.6.17, if people are still interested in 2.6.16 by
> well, 2.6.17 should have all that fixes, no?
problem is, that 2.6.17 has a looooooooot of new code ==> bugs. (just
check that sctp connection tracking stuff... it's... horrible.
> if there is great demand and/or some good reason
> to do that, we will probably go that way ...
what's the ETA on vs2.0.2 ? what are the issues on that one?
-- harry aka Rik Bobbaers K.U.Leuven - LUDIT -=- Tel: +32 485 52 71 50 Rik.Bobbaers_at_cc.kuleuven.be -=- http://harry.ulyssis.org "Work hard and do your best, it'll make it easier for the rest" -- Garfield Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserverReceived on Wed Jul 5 11:21:04 2006