Re: [Vserver] Invalid Release file, no entry for main/binary-amd64/Packages

From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert_at_13thfloor.at>
Date: Mon 27 Feb 2006 - 17:10:47 GMT
Message-ID: <20060227171047.GB16611@MAIL.13thfloor.at>

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:12:23PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:50:01AM -0600, Corey Wright wrote:
>
> > vserver test101 build -m debootstrap --hostname t101.foo.org --context 101
> > --interface hansi=dummy0:192.168.0.101/16 -- -d sarge -m
> > http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-amd64/debian
> >
> > if that doesn't work, i'd attribute the problem to the util-vserver version
> > (as 0.30.209 works for me).
>
> vserver v16 build --force -n v16 --hostname v16.ativel.com --context 101 --interface eth0:192.168.0.16/24 -m debootstrap -- -d sarge -m http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/
>
> did work for me, thanks Corey.
>
> What does --context 101 do, actually?

set a proper static context id (101) for that guest

all guests must have one, and it should better
be unique on a host (range 2-49151 for now) ...

HTH,
Herbert

> > > I'm still not sure whether I should stick with an unsupported AMD64 Sarge
> > > or go with a vanilla i386 Sarge (the machine only has 4 GBytes) -- i.e.
> > > will it hurt performance badly? 2 GByte/process limit won't bite, will
> > > absence of twice as many registers in AMD64 mode? But gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4
> > > doesn't support AMD64 all that well anyway, right?
> >
> > i don't personally have benchmark numbers (have yet to install a i386
> > guest), but the performance reported by others (due to the extra registers)
> > is the entire reason i purchased amd64 hardware, waiting until debian had a
>
> Subjectively, it is a pretty speedy machine -- even though it's only a 2.0 GHz
> single-core Opteron 146. One of my old Athlon machines died in the rack, so if it's
> the motherboard I'm considering fixing it up with an Athlon 64 board.
>
> > stable/"sarge" amd64 release. you might be able to get a comparable
> > speed-up on amd64 with a 32-bit kernel and/or user-land by recompiling all
> > packages with a more specific -mtune (ie 32-bit instruction set but
> > including scheduling, MMX, SSE, SSE2 support) than debian's i386 packages
> > (ie -mtune=i486), but i'll leave that trouble to gentoo users. ;-)
>
> I am considering recompiling a few packages, once gcc-4.x.x is available
> for Sarge. But for time being, I'd be glad just having a stable running system.
>
> --
> Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org
> ______________________________________________________________
> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com
> 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Mon Feb 27 17:12:52 2006

[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Mon 27 Feb 2006 - 17:13:01 GMT by hypermail 2.1.8