The following lines where added to the document, as you could see:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under
the terms of the GNU Free Documentation
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
This is what i can find in the original article's, since i could find
mentioning of the GNU Public License itself.
If there are differences, ill also add the GPL besides the GPDL.
On 1/12/06, Guenther Fuchs <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi Joep,
> on Thursday, January 12, 2006 at 10:57:50 AM you wrote:
> > Oppropriate links have been added, and GPL licenses are added to the
> > articles. Again, thanks for the heads up.
> Thank's for doing that, although I couldn't find the GPL on your
> article mirror:
> Pls review that - it's not that mandatory to mention me (as several
> other people contributed their thoughts and work to it as well), but I
> see it mandatory to add the GPL license note as well as I recommend
> keeping the added "original article" link.
> > Also, if you have any problems with mirroring or 'redistributing'
> > your content feel free to say so. Im not here to step on anyone's
> > feet.
> I don't feel you stomping on my feet - I just wanted to point out for
> you and especially everybody else reading this and copying docs that a
> GPL is required to be honored, otherwise it will stop working for us
> all. That includes yourself ;-)
> PS: Your page title/header is missing an "r", it shows only "infa"
> instead of "infra" ;-)
> regards 'n greez,
> Guenther Fuchs
> (aka "muh" and "powerfox")
Vserver mailing list
Received on Thu Jan 12 10:18:22 2006