I'm aware of this problem. Not really sure that it should be considered
grave but as we have a solution to it I do not really bother.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:37:59AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> tags 328209 + patch
> found 328209 0.30.208-3
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> The current way of detecting the syscall number is broken for any build
> done without a patched kernel. This doesn't show up on i386 as the
> configure script use it as by default.
Known problem.
> Attached is a patched which modifies the configure.ac (and required
> files) by using the vserver.h found upstream [1]. The buildd should
> then be able to detect the correct syscall number.
Sounds really great, thanks!
> For clarity, the patch only provides the needed changes to autotools
> source files: "autoreconf" needs to be called to regenerated the
> configure script and other files.
Ok. I think this really should be applied upstream as well. Or even better
applied upstream and then I will use the new tarball. :)
> [1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/SYSCALL/vserver.h
Ok. Lot of defines here. :)
Regards,
// Ola
> Regards,
> --
> Jérémy
-- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserverReceived on Thu Oct 27 06:27:50 2005