From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Fri 26 Aug 2005 - 20:27:12 BST
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:29:27PM +0200, Nicolas Costes wrote:
> Le mardi 23 Août 2005 14:54, Herbert Poetzl a écrit :
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:25:10PM +0200, Nicolas Costes wrote:
> > > Hello, all !!!
> > >
> > > I've just installed a vs2.0 host with a 2.6.12.5 kernel and
> > > util-vserver-*-0.30.208-2mdk.i586.rpm, and it just work fine for
> > > the moment. Good job, guys !
>
> I now have 3 hosts like this one. Too few vservers on it at the
> moment, but it will be more relevant when going full production next
> weeks.
good, keep us updated ...
> > > I noticed that the patch was made against kernel 2.6.12.4, but
> > > there is not rejection nor warnings with 2.6.12.5, so that's good.
> > > Is it luck ? Is it normal ?
>
> > no :)
>
> > > One small thing : The compiled kernel does not mention any
> > > extraversion (-vs2.0...) ! So, when using "uname -a", I only get
> > > 2.6.12.5 :(. How can I correct this ? (Although it is not that
> > > important, huh ;) !)
>
> > that's the one hunk which _got_ rejected (patching
> > the makefile) but you didn't notice :)
> > the next release will be for 2.6.12.5 or later ...
>
> Humm, er... See below ;-)
>
> > > More info in a couple of days : I'm going to build at least two
> > > other hosts. For info, I compiled vs2.0 with distcc (3 machines, 1
> > > PIII and 2 PIV HyperThreading -j{6,7,8}) , and all went fine.
> >
> > excellent, thanks for the feedback, I really
> > appreciate it!
>
> As said upper, I've now done it for 3 target hosts (PIII 1400,
> PIII1113, PIII866), and even when mixing gcc3.3mdk and gcc3.4mdk, It
> went fine. I could have tried with gcc-4.0mdk, but I didn't have time
> to play with fire ;-) (And the kernel does not compile with 4.0, as I
> read)
>
> Ok, the hard part...
>
> A litte fun for the week-end : I've ported vs-2.0 for kernel 2.6.12.4 to
> kernel 2.6.12.5 ! I'm proud of it, it's my first kernel patch :
sorry to disappoint you, but strictly speaking, it's
not a kernel patch ... it's a meta patch, patching a
kernel patch :)
> [nayco@ Vservers]$ ls patch-2.6.12*
> patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff patch-2.6.12.5-vs2.0.diff
>
> [nayco@ Vservers]$ diff -u patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff patch-2.6.12.5-vs2.0.diff
> --- patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff 2005-08-26 20:14:26.518105072 +0200
> +++ patch-2.6.12.5-vs2.0.diff 2005-08-26 20:16:03.272279117 +0200
> @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@
> VERSION = 2
> PATCHLEVEL = 6
> SUBLEVEL = 12
> --EXTRAVERSION = .4
> -+EXTRAVERSION = .4-vs2.0
> +-EXTRAVERSION = .5
> ++EXTRAVERSION = .5-vs2.0
> NAME=Woozy Numbat
>
> # *DOCUMENTATION*
> [nayco@ Vservers]$
>
> First patch, huh ? Well, er, my last.
lol
best,
Herbert
> --
> <DarkHunt> hep
> <DarkHunt> quelle dif entre dns et ip ?
>
> - #linuxfr
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver