From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 08 Aug 2005 - 16:40:34 BST
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 04:44:21PM +0200, Andreas John wrote:
> Good Question! If diff'ed a little:
> aj_at_derjohn:~/linux-vserver$ diff patch-188.8.131.52-vs2.0.diff
> patch-184.108.40.206-vs2.0-rc9.diff |grep -v "+++" |grep -v "\-\-\-" |egrep -v
> "^([0-9]+|..diff )"
> < -EXTRAVERSION = .4
> < +EXTRAVERSION = .4-vs2.0
> > -EXTRAVERSION = .3
> > +EXTRAVERSION = .3-vs2.0-rc9
> It seems that there is no change except extraversion. The old patch was
> vs. 220.127.116.11, the vs. 18.104.22.168, but it applies without any changes.
> And: Is Ola aware of the release, so we may urge him so pack it in
> Debain Sid soon?
actually also sarge would largely benefit from a stable
linux-vserver version (maybe introduced as bugfix?)
> @herbert: It would make sense not to call the patches "vs", becuase
> this could be misunderstood as "versus" - and it is not a patch versus
> an old 2.0 ....
two letter acronym misinterpretation can always happen,
even if I call it 'xy' and vserver folks by now _know_
that we have the following schema:
... for patches which apply to <base>
... for changes between versions
... for fixes, changes, addons ...
and XY was always 'vs' for linux-vserver since a long
time now ... so, sorry, but I don#t see a good reason
to change it now ...
> Per Andreas Buer wrote:
> >Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >>Greetings Community!
> >>after some time of testing and ironing out minor
> >>issues we proudly present the first stable release
> >>for the 2.6 kernels ...
> >Great. Are there any changes from rc9?
> >Vserver mailing list
> Vserver mailing list
Vserver mailing list