From: Bert De Vuyst (bert.devuyst_at_intec.ugent.be)
Date: Wed 13 Jul 2005 - 10:35:22 BST
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 16:27, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:40:29AM +0930, Darryl Ross wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Resending as I used the wrong source address.
> >
> > Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:04:49AM +0930, Mike O'Connor wrote:\
> > >
> > >>The reason why I need to have a woody version of the tools is that is
> > >>just to hard to upgrade all the systems I have out there, particularly
> > >>as they a mostly in data center in places a long way a way.
> > >
> > > hmm, and I always thought that gentoo uses source only
> > > packages not debian :)
> >
> > The problem we are having is that we have a large number of Debian Woody
> > machines deployed which are are not able to easily upgrade to Sarge.
> >
> > Smiley aside, the errors Mike posted were from attempting to backport
> > the version of the tools in Sarge to Woody. We'd love to try "a recent
> > compiler" if you can let us know where one is for Woody!
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html
If you are looking at pre build packages for debian woody, take a look at the
next sites:
http://www.apt-get.org
http://www.backports.org
Best regards,
Bert.
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver