From: Matthew Walster (matthew_at_walster.org)
Date: Wed 15 Jun 2005 - 00:05:37 BST
This sounds like a really bad idea - theoretically it's possible to assign
eth0 and eth1 to a virtual server, but you're asking for trouble. It would be
far better to do it in real kernel space as the security risks are minimal -
if existant.
If you WERE to go ahead with it, you may have to resort to using eth0:0 and
eth0:1, as I'm not sure how to assign eth1 in a user-mode process, (I'm only
really familiar with tun/tap, literally only just installing vserver at this
time after playing with uml) and I'm sure someone else will fill you in on
that.
Just reconsider - why are you compartmentalising this service? Is it due to
security or just because you don't want the main server having _any_ services
above kernel-mode?
Matthew Walster
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 22:22, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:34:18PM +0200, Moritz Rudert wrote:
> > Hello
> > I want to run a debian-router in my VServer. So I need to use a real
> > Interface (eth1). My question: Is it posible to do this?
>
> yes
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
> > Greetings
> > Moritz Rudert
> > _______________________________________________
> > Vserver mailing list
> > Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver