From: Ehab Heikal (ehab_at_elmotaheda.com)
Date: Mon 11 Apr 2005 - 21:13:15 BST
Cool now it will be called stable.
I have one question, is virtual networking like with freevps doable? Or
is it not there yet or not planned.
-----Original Message-----
From: vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org
[mailto:vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org] On Behalf Of Ehab Heikal
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:44 PM
To: vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org; blankerts_at_salesemotion.de
Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
I am confused, if it is stable why is the 1.9 branch called development.
-----Original Message-----
From: vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org
[mailto:vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org] On Behalf Of Arne
Blankerts
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:27 PM
To: vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 12:41 +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote:
> how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a
> production envoirnment.
Stable is very relative definition [tm]
I've been using the 2.6 branch on two production servers for quite some
time now with no known problems. Actually, it's more stable then the 2.4
version ever was for me...
CYA Arne
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver