From: Paul S. Gumerman (psg_at_cooldog.com)
Date: Thu 07 Apr 2005 - 04:26:37 BST
SELINUX can be disabled at boot time, or I can remove it from the kernel
build. I *know* that I'm going to have to rebuild the kernel.
Should be interesting to see whether I can patch the Centos-RH kernel
sources, or if I'll have to start with vanilla.
I was going to do this today, but a good friend came by with a PC
infected with CoolWebSearch. If I'm every in the presence of the jerk
that wrote THAT crap, I may just employ the .357 solution. Damn ... but
it was hard to get rid of!
Ehab Heikal wrote:
>Centos 4 is based on 2.6 kernel, is the 2.6 branch stable. Plus RH now
>has selinux security "enhancements" these will not be compatible with a
>plain vanilla kernel like vserver.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org
>[mailto:vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org] On Behalf Of Paul S.
>Gumerman
>Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:41 PM
>To: vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
>Subject: [Vserver] CentOs distribution
>
>
>Has anyone tried the CentOs 4.0 distribution with linux-vserver? It's a
>
>repackage of RedHat Enterprise Linux 4.0. I'm currently using A
>mish-mash of FC1, 2 & 3 and I'm considering a switch to CentOs. Two of
>my servers are Opteron-based, so I'm particularly interested if you are
>using the x86_64 arch.
>
>http://www.centos.org
>
>Paul
>_______________________________________________
>Vserver mailing list
>Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
>http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
>_______________________________________________
>Vserver mailing list
>Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
>http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver