From: Olivier Poitrey (olivier_at_pas-tres.net)
Date: Wed 13 Oct 2004 - 18:01:04 BST
Jörn Engel <joern_at_wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> writes:
> New-variant cowlinks are closer to symlinks than anything else.
> Like symlinks they allocate an extra inode per link. Like fast
> symlinks for ext they store the link information in the inode
> Still, don't think of it as a symlink, it's not. Close, but
I think it's a very good idea, but do you know if mmaping several
cow-linked files that way would give us the same benefits than
(sym)links which is to have it only once into memory?
-- Olivier Poitrey _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver