From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 11 Oct 2004 - 10:45:55 BST
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:48:27AM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >
> >up to 16 addresses are currently allowed in this set
> >in the future the limit will go away (network code is
> >actually the oldest piece) by using 'markings'
> >(network is virtualized to allow binding to 0.0.0.0)
>
> Interesting. Is it the intention that these changes be entirely
> transparent to host-based firewall implementations (is that possible?),
> or entirely administered by them?
although the former would be the better solution,
the latter one seems more realistic to me ...
> Or some mixture?
probably, any good ideas are welcome, as usual ;)
best,
Herbert
> --
> Sam Vilain, sam /\T vilain |><>T net, PGP key ID: 0x05B52F13
> (include my PGP key ID in personal replies to avoid spam filtering)
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver