From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Tue 21 Sep 2004 - 16:11:30 BST
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:12:35PM +0300, Alexander Suvorov wrote:
Hey Say! good to hear that you are still working
on freevps? with Alexey ...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 21 September 2004 14:57, Brian wrote:
>
> > Konrad, I have change everything bevor I mail to the list ... It's not a
> > problem with the vserver number4 . I shut down the Vserver. ping the IP of
> > the vserver. normay I must get a timeout. but the dummy interface is
> > pinging back with a wrong IP.
> >
> > Alex ,
> > "patches against vs1.3.6 and vs1.24 are always welcome ;)" I use
> > util-vserver-0.30 and patch patch-2.4.27-rc2-vs1.28.diff..
> >
> > "routes for this addess be cached in rt_cashe." how to ???
>
> Brian, to avoid this problem the vserver strongly requires
> to mark all kernel route cache entries with context id
> or to separate this route cache table by contexts.
probably I'm too <wossname> to see the 'problem'
which leads to a separated route cache for _not_
routed packets ...
> this has already done several months ago in freevps project
> (http://freevps.com), but not implemented into the vserver
> project yet.
exactly because I don't see a good reason for
adding this ...
best,
Herbert
> > ---- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alex Lyashkov" <umka_at_sevinter.net>
> > To: <vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org>; <konrad_at_pandur.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Vserver] eth0 + dummy0
> >
> > ?? ??????, 21.09.2004, ?? 13:53, Konrad Korzeniowski ??????????:
> > > Brian napisa??(a):
> > > > I cannot understand..
> > > >
> > > > I have a Hostsystem with
> > > >
> > > > eth0 = Internet address
> > > > dummy0 = Privat address
> > > >
> > > > 1 Vserver with Privat address bind on dummy0
> > > > 2 Vserver with Internet and Privat address.
> > > >
> > > > its running well, fast and stable.
> > > >
> > > > yesterday I install Vserver number 4 with Internet and Privat address
> >
> > too. It's running well too.. I install apache and mail ... I go to the
> > Webinterface of my software in this new vServer. everything running well. 5
> > minutes later the 4. Vserver are offline .. I try to ping but nothing is go
> > . restart vserver ... nothing changed...
> >
> > > > I go to the Host system and ping the IP ..
> > > >
> > > > ping 83.xxx.yy.zz
> > > > PING 83.xxx.yy.zz (83.xxx.yy.zz): 56 data bytes
> > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
> > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
> > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
> > > > 64 bytes from 10.49.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
> > > >
> > > > 10.49.0.1 is the dummy0 of the host system ..
> > > >
> > > > why !!??
> > > >
> > > > when the server are down, it's the same ..
> > > >
> > > > I don't know whats rong ..
> > >
> > > My solution was changing order of IP addresses in config file
> > > (IPROOT) - first one should be public address. But my problem occurs
> > > only with such applications as razor2, pyzor... with iptraf I've
> > > discoverd that tcp packets with private source address are trying
> > > to get out trough 'public' interface (ip_forwarding = 0, no iptables)
> > >
> > > Looks like this setting influences somehow routing - is it possible?
> > >
> > > (2.4.26-vs1.27)
> >
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg05959.html
>
> - --
> Alexander Suvorov
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFBUBq4xjHOd7EAl8MRAuSTAJsEMwwSmv0jwgyW3ZBq/Lq9/zbXNACfcIO9
> 3Pssr0X92MbOo6ASdleA/V4=
> =Omnr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver