About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Sandino Araico Sánchez (sandino_at_sandino.net)
Date: Fri 17 Sep 2004 - 08:02:20 BST


Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:

>Based on my reading of perf. numbers published in LSM's USENIX security
>conference, LSM does not impact performance any more significantly than
>vserver does. I.e., the numbers are so small that it doesn't really appear
>to make a big difference. Correct me if I wrong! I cannot comment on LSM
>being well tested or not.
>
>
LSM seems not to have good acceptance in other security projects:
http://www.grsecurity.net/lsm.php
http://www.rsbac.org/documentation/lsm.php

>More importantly, my hope is that by moving to LSM it is possible to stack
>other security systems on top of vserver.
>
GR Security combines conflictless with linux-vserver without any need
for LSM.

http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=grsecurityHowto

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Fri 17 Sep 2004 - 08:41:07 BST by hypermail 2.1.3