From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Tue 14 Sep 2004 - 23:30:44 BST
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 07:18:14PM -0300, James MacLean wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:51:09PM -0300, James MacLean wrote:
> >>Hi Folks,
> >Hi James!
> >><>Maybe some remember us posting this with the 2.4.23-rc1 kernel?
> >>Anyway... It's back... At least for me.
> >>. patch-2.6.9-rc1-bk13-vs188.8.131.52.diff
> >>. linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk1
> >>Happened in an rc1 kernel too ;). Hand patched in some of the diff.
> >>could you test if patch-2.6.9-rc1-bk12-vs184.108.40.206.diff
> >>(on the appropriate or similar kernel) showes this
> >>behaviour or not?
> By appropriate, would the patch-2.6.9-rc2-vs220.127.116.11.diff against
> linux-2.6.9-rc2 suffice? Or is it the particular patch
> patch-2.6.9-rc1-bk12-vs18.104.22.168.diff you want me to make a kernel with?
yep, the patch right after that one, the .24 you obviously
tested (read your lines above) changed some things regarding
rcu, and I'd like to know if that is the cause ...
> >><>After doing an "netstat -nap --inet" for a while, the whole kernel
> >>drops. As netconsole is not working for me I am off to find a serial
> >>serial kernel oops dump would be appreciated ...
> Don't hold your breath :(. Can not find a null modem and cables :(. Plus
> the test box is down and didn't auto reboot this time so I'm sending
> someone in to revive it :).
I can wait ;) ...
Vserver mailing list