From: Marc E. Fiuczynski (mef_at_CS.Princeton.EDU)
Date: Mon 13 Sep 2004 - 18:33:39 BST
Herbert,
>I've already contacted the author, some time ago,
>and again yesterday, maybe we can work together
>on that ... we'll see ...
What would you expect to happen via this collaboration with the BSDJAIL
project? I.e., would vserver move to an LSM implementation?
>yes, it seems to be the IBM approach to vservers
>(based on LSM but maybe? on it's way into mainline)
It would be good if vserver was based on LSM, too, rather than its current
approach. However, as you mentioned in a previous discussion, there are
additional things that vserver does/requires that are not part of LSM. What
are these and which one of those can be assumed by CKRM?
Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org
[mailto:vserver-bounces_at_list.linux-vserver.org]On Behalf Of Herbert
Poetzl
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:21 AM
To: Christian Mayrhuber
Cc: vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: [Vserver] Re: BSDJAILS in 2.6.x as LSM?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 05:11:09PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> What is this?
>
> I guess it's incompatible with linux vserver:
>
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3823?PHPSESSID=547dfb4ca1fb6e90bc185bba02229
ea5
thanks,
Herbert
> --
> lg, Chris
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver