From: jgalvez_at_webpipe.net
Date: Fri 27 Aug 2004 - 17:06:32 BST
I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load
production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into
2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results.
-Josh
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 09:03, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2004 11:48, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2.
> > I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup:
> >
> > Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 (root_at_build) (gcc version 3.3.4
> > (Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004
> >
> > processor : 0
> > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> > cpu family : 6
> > model : 4
> > model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
> > stepping : 2
> > cpu MHz : 1008.993
> > cache size : 256 KB
> > fdiv_bug : no
> > hlt_bug : no
> > f00f_bug : no
> > coma_bug : no
> > fpu : yes
> > fpu_exception : yes
> > cpuid level : 1
> > wp : yes
> > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
> > cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
> > bogomips : 2011.95
> >
> > 768MB RAM
> >
> > Uptime:
> > 11:27:27 up 8 days, 36 min, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.01
> >
> > Running the following vservers, all debian woody, except the build host
> > which is on sarge:
> >
> > - bind9
> > - cvs trough ssh
> > - syslog-ng + network/system monitoring software
> > - squid
> > - apache + chillisoft asp + php + tomcat + ftp test system
> > - gcc build host
> >
> > The NIC is a Intel Corp. 82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev
> > 2)
> >
> > VServers reside on a LVM volume on top of AMI Megaraid hardware raid.
> >
> > Filesystem in use is reiserfs + chris masons data logging patches
> > mounted with data=ordered,rw,attrs
> >
> > Vserver utilities in use are (Debian woody backport):
> > ii vserver 0.29-1 Virtual private servers and context switching
> >
> > I've not found any different behaviour to 2.4.26-vs1.27.
>
> The same holds true after 15 days of uptime :-)).
>
> Did anybody else try 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 on a spare or
> productive machine?
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver