From: Floris van Gog (floris_at_vangog.net)
Date: Thu 12 Feb 2004 - 13:19:07 GMT
This is a server running 1.22.
Viorel Anghel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Floris van Gog wrote:
>
>>BIND9 does not even need CAP_SYS_RESOURCE. It is running in a vserver
>>here (1.2x) without problems with S_CAP="" in the config file.
>
>
> which 1.2x exactly?
>
>
>>Why grant it things it does not need?
>>
>>
>>Alex Lyashkov wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thursday 12 February 2004 13:58, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Viorel Anghel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>My first post here and i would like to thank to all the developers for
>>>>>their terrific work.
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, my problem. Short story: kernel 2.4.24, vserver 1.26 (no other
>>>>>patches). bind9 with nocapset (Paul Sladen's debian packages), running
>>>>>inside a vserver. doesn't answer to udp requests, but works with tcp
>>>>>requests.
>>>>>
>>>>>short question: does anyone using bind9 inside vserver with recent series
>>>>>of patches (it worked for me with old Jacques Gélinas's ctx patches).
>>>>
>>>>Yes,
>>>>
>>>>Debian woody, kernel-2.4.24-vs1.26, Bind9 9.2.1-2.woody,
>>>>S_CAPS="CAP_SYS_RESOURCE" in $VSERVER.conf.
>>>>Running fine with vs1.26 as it did with ctx17a.
>>>>
>>>
>>>in 1.2.x CAP_SYS_RESOURCE allow vps admin overwrite process limit per vps.
>>>it safety to use only with 1.3.x
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Vserver mailing list
>>Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
>>http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
>
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver