From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Thu 12 Feb 2004 - 12:53:56 GMT

• Previous message: Floris van Gog: "Re: [Vserver] bind9 in vserver (new...)"
• In reply to: Alejandro Mery: "Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable vs1.26 Security Part II"
• Next in thread: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable vs1.26 Security Part II"

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:48:23PM -0300, Alejandro Mery wrote:
> Jan Panoch wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Have anyone a idea, how to avoid this security risk and continue to
> > use XFS as my filesystem?
> > 1.26 patch is functional only on ext2/ext3 filesystems, i think..
>
> is the ext2/3 attr patch included in 1.26 or should i download something
> extra?, i remember have read something about an special patch but it was
> 'long' time ago.

what exactly do you mean? please elaborate ...

FYI:

 - IUNLINK support (using the +t flag) is there
   since vs1.00 (and before)

 - the (000 +t) barrier was included in vs1.26
   and enabled in vs1.3.7

HTH,
Herbert

>
> thanks,
> Alejandro Mery
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

• Previous message: Floris van Gog: "Re: [Vserver] bind9 in vserver (new...)"
• In reply to: Alejandro Mery: "Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable vs1.26 Security Part II"
• Next in thread: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable vs1.26 Security Part II"